Friday, October 30, 2015
Meusault and Compliance
The Stranger is a very strange book because it forces us to confront situations that are unfamiliar and strange. Meursault is a character that shatters all possible expectations, he seems like he lives a relatively normal life on the surface yet he is completely devoid of any emotion and is brutally honest about everything and everyone. He truly doesn’t seem to care what other people think of him, even when he feels self-conscious during the funeral for not looking at his mother’s body, that doesn’t stop him from sticking with his decision. Despite him seeing that Marie is visibly upset by him not claiming to love her. he doesn’t choose to change his answer when she asks again later on. In particular, he doesn’t seem to be governed by any morals or even governmental laws since he doesn’t fear the consequences.. It is really interesting to look at this in the context of the situation. As we have talked about a little bit, Camus novel was written in the context of a Vichy government installed by the Germans to run France. In this context, it seems like Camus might be trying to criticize people who complied with the Germans after they took over, whether explicitly or implicitly.
Meursault complies with Raymond’s clearly immoral deeds, but he never seems to be truly a part of the situation, at least until he kills the man. Throughout the first part of the book, he is slowly drawn deeper into Raymond’s scheme, eventually turning from an innocent bystander into a murderer. However, despite everything that makes it seem as such, by the narration in the book we can tell that Meursault did not commit premeditated murder, and that instead, the murder just happened. Meursault takes full responsibility for his actions and yet infuriatingly refuses to acknowledge his reasons. What makes the situation even more striking is that Meursault is the only witness and in a racist court system, a simple lie about the man rushing at him with a knife would’ve have sufficed to ensure his freedom. Meursault’s complete disregard for his, and others’ existence until the end when he is faced with death is striking as Camus is asking some real questions about the meaning of life.
Meursault’s compliance with Raymond can be compared in some ways to French citizens who complied with the Nazis during World War II. There are undertones of fear in Meursault’s relationship with Raymond, as there does seem to be a sense that Meursault would find it difficult to say no to Raymond. The French citizens during WWII were faced with the same dilemma, since speaking out and fighting the Nazis could very easily result in death but complying with them seems immoral in that you are complying with a force of evil. War impacted Camus from early in life, as his father died in World War I, and Camus himself was deemed physically unfit to serve in the army. However, Camus was deeply involved in the French Resistance and throughout the Stranger, there is a feeling that Camus is warning against going with the crowd, whether it is how the court treats Meursault or how Meursault acts in relation to Raymond. Camus questions the meaning of life throughout the book and it seems like one thing that he found meaning in is to do what’s right, because if you go with the crowd, your life is insignificant, whereas if you resist, at least you have given yourself meaning in some small way.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think the historical component to this novel is very interesting but, understandably, not something discussed in-depth during class. Trying to make sense of the moral dilemmas that Meursault faces--or chooses not to face--as a result of Nazi occupation raises some difficult and maybe even unanswerable questions as to why Camus wrote his protagonist the way he did. It seems he is trying to paint a complex picture of a Nazi complier, and yet he is also tying this character to unprovoked murder and arguably sociopathic tendencies. Was Camus simply imposing internal challenges on his novel for his own entertainment?
ReplyDeleteThe idea that the character Meursault is analogous to the French People under Nazi occupation is quite interesting, and I think it makes Camus' perspective on why the French Resistance was so vital a little bit more understandable. If we consider Meursault to represent someone under Nazi occupation (French or otherwise), his life actually makes a lot of sense. Basically, he does all the things that are easiest for him, even if they are not morally correct, just as many people went along with the Nazis and kept their heads down. As time goes on, however, this path leads him to inadvertently commit more and more heinous crimes, all the way up to murder. Many people who complied with the Nazis lead such lives, even though at heart they may have been ordinary, good people. If we look back on Meursault's life, however, the outcome seems like it should have been ridiculously easy for him to change, and many of us, including me, feel no sympathy for him, and that he is morally responsible for his actions. Perhaps Camus was using Meursault to illustrate how absurd compliance with the Nazis is, and how important it is to assert one's own agency when it comes to matters of ethics and morality.
ReplyDeleteYou point out "undertones of fear" in Meursault's interactions with Raymond. This might be an overstatement, given how basically chill Meursault remains throughout these scenes, but I think you make a good point: we see how M. doesn't like to displease anyone, and it's clear that Raymond is a lot more enthusiastic about them being "pals" than Meursault is, who basically nods and says "okay." It's not clear if this "fear" or discomfort with Raymond is *moral* in nature, though--if he objects to Raymond's treatment of women, for example (he sure doesn't seem to--he could at least *agree* when Marie says "it's terrible"!). Raymond maybe makes him a little uncomfortable, but he doesn't seem to see him as a "Nazi," to follow the analogy. He just doesn't have any reason "not to" follow him.
ReplyDelete